Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:31

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Rory McIlroy Says He Shot 81 at Oakmont Last Week - Sports Illustrated
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Tulsa, Oklahoma, plans more than $105m in reparations for America's 'hidden' massacre - BBC
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Oldest human DNA ever found tells the story of a lost branch on the human family tree - Earth.com
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
These glowing axolotls may hold the secret to human limb regeneration - The Washington Post
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why are black people seen as scary or a threat to some people?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Erin Patterson tells murder trial exotic mushrooms 'have more flavour' - BBC
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Doloremque harum est natus ipsum quasi at atque quam.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Which certification is most valuable in the IT field, and why?